Resources & Energy
High consequence delivery environments where mobilisation, interface, and governance discipline protect program certainty.
Environment constraints
- Remote logistics and constrained mobilisation windows
- High consequence HSE and permitting requirements
- Complex contractor interfaces and scope boundaries
- Commissioning and handover sensitivity
Delivery risks we manage
- Interface failure and scope ambiguity
- Mobilisation slippage and readiness gaps
- Governance drift under program pressure
- Reporting misalignment across stakeholders
Controls applied
- Structured mobilisation and readiness reviews
- Interface mapping and responsibility clarity
- Governance cadence aligned to executive reporting
- Traceable controls: actions, decisions, and approvals
Engagement structure
Advisory oversight and targeted capability deployment — structured to support sponsors and delivery leadership without adding operational friction.
Where appropriate, we align reporting to sponsor cadence and capital governance expectations.
Selected project environments
Referenced for sector context only — not a claim of project delivery.
- Eliwana NPI — Fortescue Metals Group (FMG)
Non-process infrastructure environment within a major iron ore development in Western Australia. Characterised by large-scale contractor interface, remote logistics, staged commissioning, and capital governance discipline. - Black Cat Village Camp Extension — Ramelius Resources
Remote camp expansion environment supporting operational growth. - Dalgaranga Camp Construction — Ramelius Resources
New-build accommodation infrastructure within an active gold mining operation. - Caladenia Village Extension — Greenbushes (Talison Lithium)
Camp expansion within a high-production lithium mining environment. - Greenbushes “Old Mill” Camp Demobilisation — Talison Lithium
Structured demobilisation and rationalisation within a live operating environment.
Discuss a sector-aligned scope
We’ll confirm fit, timing, and engagement model before proceeding.